Welcome back for the final week of Design Series. For this last post, I will get more in depth about publishing.
I want to expand upon one thing I mentioned briefly last week: the use or creation of a pattern template. I talked about giving your patterns a consistent look and feel or theme, which is really part of a template.
When designing for a publication, they will have you write your pattern using a guide. Knitty has a template posted so that your submission (a completed pattern) follows their style guidelines exactly. Other publications will send you a template once your pattern has been accepted for publication.
Following a guide allows your pattern to match the format of the publication so that all patterns are consistently laid out. Every publisher tends to express things like materials, pattern sections, and abbreviations a little differently. For example, Knitty has you list a yarn source like this:
[MC] Manufacturer Name [fiber content; #yd/#m per #g skein]; color: ColorName; # skeins;
While Interweave Knits has you list it like this:
Manufacturer and Yarn Name (fiber content; #yd [# m]/# g): color name (MC), # skeins;
When self-publishing, you are the editor, and therefore you may create your own style guidelines. One of the best ways to know how to layout your own patterns is to take a look at existing patterns from various sources. What pieces do you think make reading the pattern easier? What elements confuse you? Do you like when the designer/publisher lists the basic stitches first and only refers to them in the pattern later? Do you like seeing k1 or k for a single knit stitch?
One of the scariest parts to designing is putting yourself and your design out into the world. It will be judged. There will be people that love it, and those that hate it. When you make something public, you invite the world to critique, comment, and otherwise share their opinions openly. Every published design is a new learning experience. Embrace the good, and use the bad to improve your next design.
When it comes to self-publishing there are several options. You can list it electronically on your blog or webpage, Ravelry, Patternfish, Etsy, Artfire, etc. You can also choose to offer it to your local yarn store or other online retailers on a wholesale level.
A word of caution about selling a pattern on Etsy or Artfire: be sure to state clearly that it is a pattern and not a finished garment. Some shoppers see a picture of a finished piece and assume that is what they are buying. Imagine how disappointed they are when they receive a pattern instead.
For me, the best option at this time is to offer my pattern for free both on my blog and on Ravelry. There some controversy about designers offering free patterns, but until I become better established, I feel this is appropriate for me. Any future Design Series patterns will also be free.
Speaking of free patterns – when am I publishing Nancy & Judy? I am almost finished the layout, and just need to go over it a few times before it will be ready. Look for it mid-week!
ETA: It’s available now!
Tags: design, Design Series


[...] March 22: Inspiration March 29: Sketch & Swatch March 31: Q&A – Submissions April 2: Q&A – Sizing April 5: Prototyping April 6: Q&A – Charts/Copyright April 12: Testing & Tools April 19: Publishing [...]
[...] Read the original: Design Series: Publishing « digitalnabi – ambitions, dreams and … [...]
[...] See the original post here: Design Series: Publishing « digitalnabi – ambitions, dreams and … [...]
I have you bookmarked to check out new stuffyou post.
Notable weblog, kudos for writing this report
“There some controversy about designers offering free patterns”
I was wondering what you meant by that? I think I may have picked up on some hint of this in a few ravelry threads (designers not ‘valuing’ their work by giving their patterns away free, or devaluing all knitting patterns by sharing their free of charge. I wondered if you meant the controversy was something along these lines, or something else?
Mimi,
Exactly. Some designers feel that the proliferation of free patterns is devaluing the for-pay patterns. As well as perhaps bringing down the quality of pattern writing in general. I was going to link to some discussions on Ravelry where I have picked up on this vibe, but thought it best to not do so.
I agree that giving things away for free can be seen as not valuing my own work. However, and I made this comment on Plurk just the other day, I just don’t feel right taking my readers on this journey of design and then making them pay for it at the end. I will be designing other shawls, and hopefully they are just as nice as this one.
For me, offering free patterns is a great way to introduce people to your pattern style. It’s like a preview, a taste that will make them want to purchase your patterns in the future.
Thanks for your comment